Complaints Against CL&P Rise, Complaints Against UI Fall

March 31, 2011
By

According to the Consumer Scorecard released today by the Department of Public Utility Control (Department), the Department’s Consumer Services Unit (CSU) received fewer consumer complaints per 100,000 customers during calendar year 2010 from customers of:  Thames Valley Communications, United Illuminating, Connecticut Natural Gas, Cox Connecticut Telecommunications, Aquarion Water Company of Connecticut and Viridian Energy than it did for their industry peers in Connecticut.

For the fifth consecutive year, CSU received the fewest complaints per 100,000 customers from customers of the Aquarion Water Company when taking into account all utility sectors in Connecticut.

CSU received more consumer complaints per 100,000 customers in calendar year 2010 from customers of:  Comcast Middletown, Connecticut Light and Power Company, Southern Connecticut Gas, One Communications, United Water Systems and NextEra Energy Services than it did for their industry peers in Connecticut.

The Consumer Scorecard compares the number of complaints regarding billing, deposits, general complaints, meters, installations, outages, payment arrangements, quality of service, slamming and terminations.  Customer inquiries related to requests for general information, utility rates and tariffs, telephone numbers or calls involving general questions from consumers are not included in the Consumer Scorecard figures.

During CY 2010, the number of consumer telephone calls to the Department’s CSU totaled about 45,000.  In about 3,917 cases, staff of the CSU conducted a formal investigation of the customer complaint, a decrease of 6% from the 4,168 formal investigations conducted by CSU in CY 2009.  This decrease in complaints occurred mostly in the areas of:  billing, installations, metering, payment arrangements and terminations.

For calendar year 2010, overall complaints involving all electric companies were essentially unchanged from the previous year; complaints regarding all natural gas companies decreased by 15% compared to the previous year, and cable company complaints decreased by 22% compared to the previous year.  Complaints involving all telecommunications companies decreased overall by 5% compared to the previous year, while all regulated water company complaints were virtually unchanged from the previous year.

Complaints involving electric suppliers and aggregators rose from 90 in CY 2009 to 222 in CY 2010, while the number of customers who switched to an electric supplier grew from 280,000 in December 2009 to 630,000 in December 2010.

The Consumer Scorecard ranks 63 companies: 3 gas companies, 2 electric companies, 7 telecommunications companies, 24 video cable franchises, 6 water companies and 21 electric suppliers and aggregators.

The overall complaint figures for each industry received during calendar year 2010 fluctuated from those received in prior calendar years as follows:

Industry CY 2010 CY 2009 CY 2008 CY 2007
All 3917 4168 3857 3469
Cable 845 1080 874 796
Electric 1760 1773 1418 1544
Gas 553 654 798 549
Telecommunications 446 470 609 505
Water 46 47 48 60
Video Service Provider 42 57 50 13
Electric Suppliers 222 90 70 4

The Consumer Scorecard is based on an index number that shows the number of complaints per 100,000 customers, which enables comparison of large and small companies alike.  For very small companies, even a minor change in the number of complaints could dramatically change a company’s score from one year to the next.  To calculate the scorecard, the DPUC uses only those contacts classified as jurisdictional complaints; that is, calls, letters or e-mails from customers who first contacted the utility company about their complaint but remained dissatisfied even after speaking to the utility company.  The information in the Consumer Scorecard does not reflect the validity of the complaint, just that the customer was not satisfied with the company’s service, response or proposed resolution to his or her complaint.

Some fluctuation for any one company can be expected from a scorecard rating in one year to the next.  This can be based upon special or seasonal circumstances such as weather-related issues, rate case proceedings, company changes to its customer service practices and procedures, rising energy prices, an increase in customers, changes in the economy, quality of service, the financial and economic demographics of a company’s service territory, the availability of energy assistance funds, termination activity, uncollectible levels and the like.

The DPUC’s Vice Chairman, John W. Betkoski III (lead Commissioner for water issues), praised Aquarion “for achieving this record for the last five years”.  The DPUC’s Chairman, Kevin M. DelGobbo, commenting on the Consumer Scorecard stated, “The Consumer Scorecard is one tool to measure a utility company’s customer satisfaction but it is not the definitive instrument to evaluate the level of service that a utility company provides to its customers or how those customers rate the company’s customer service.  In this time of extraordinary economic challenges, the Department strongly believes that each utility company must have as its first priority to provide high quality customer service as well as creating an environment in which its customers believe that they are getting the customer service they are paying for and that they are in fact the company’s number one priority.”
Attached for your convenience is a copy of the CY 2010 Consumer Scorecard.  The CY 2010 Consumer Scorecard and Press Release are also posted on the Department’s web page (www.state.ct.us/dpuc/).

State of Connecticut
Department of Public Utility Control
Consumer Services Unit (CSU)
Calendar Year 2010 Scorecard

 

Total
Utility Name Score Customers complaints
CATV 1760 (1)
Cablevision of Connecticut 44.60 125,565 56
Cablevision of Litchfield, Inc. 43.28 27,725 12
Cablevision of Southern Connecticut 47.17 97,512 46
Charter Comm/Northeast 92.86 30,153 28
Charter Comm/Western 54.00 62,960 34
Comcast/Branford 88.56 56,461 50
Comcast/Clinton 76.79 23,440 18
Comcast/Danbury 115.58 33,743 39
Comcast/Groton 100.48 19,905 20
Comcast/Hartford 151.74 84,355 128
Comcast/Lakeville 161.92 4,323 7
Comcast/Lyme 110.57 8,140 9
Comcast/Middletown 195.84 23,489 46
Comcast/New Haven 132.73 62,533 83
Comcast/Norwich 123.09 17,060 21
Comcast/Plainville 127.71 67,338 86
Comcast/Seymour 92.03 31,510 29
Comcast/Vernon 81.65 25,718 21
Comcast/Waterbury 113.06 37,150 42
Cox Comm./Enfield 42.34 35,429 15
Cox Comm./Manchester 33.86 59,075 20
Cox Comm./Meriden 42.62 35,193 15
MetroCast Cablevision 57.92 32,803 19
Thames Valley Communication 11.39 8,777 1

 

Total
Utility Name Score Customers complaints
ELECTRIC 1760 (1)
CL&P 116.14 1,203,735 1398
UI 104.47 325,466 340
GAS 553 (1)
Connecticut Natural Gas 57.03 171,845 98
Southern Connecticut Gas Company 140.31 189,586 266
Yankee Gas Services Company 88.02 214,727 189
SUPPLIERS/AGGREGATORS 222 (1)
Better Cost 1 (3)
Choice Energy 53.68 1,863 1
Clearview Electric 65.77 12,164 8
Con Edison Solutions 16.18 18,546 3
Constellation New Energy Inc. 22.75 13,188 3
Direct Energy Services 25.78 65,932 17
Discount Power 37.73 23,854 9
Dominion Retail 21.19 28,319 6
Energy Plus 17.74 39,451 7
Freedom Choice Energy 13 (3)
Liberty Power Holdings 150.83 1,326 2
MXenergy 47.60 54,617 26
NextEra Energy Services (f/k/a Gexa Energy) 206.61 968 2
North America Power & Gas 22.10 40,726 9
Patriot Energy 2 (3)
Positive Energy 21 (3)
Public Power & Utility 43.28 62,390 27
ResCom Energy 25.68 58,411 15
Starion Energy 30.80 29,217 9
Verde Energy 108.98 33,952 37
Viridian Energy 12.34 8,107 1
TELEPHONE 446 (1)
SNET d/b/a AT&T CT 24.95 1,286,551 321
Verizon 109.18 24,729 27
AT&T 39.47 35,468 14
Comcast Digital Phone 33 (2) 38 (2)
Cox Connecticut Telcom L.L.C 10.01 79,909 8
MCI 23.51 8,507 2
One Communications 120.31 10,805 13
Total
Utility Name Score Customers complaints
VIDEO SERVICE PROVIDER 42 (1)
AT&T U-Verse 42 (2) 57 (2)
WATER 46 (1)
Aquarion Water Company of CT 2.75 181,829 5
Connecticut Water Company 13.55 88,534 12
Hazardville 13.72 7,286 1
Torrington Water Company 10.41 9,607 1
United Water Company 84.13 7,132 6
Valley Water Systems, Inc. 29.74 6,725 2

(1) This figure represents the total complaints for the industry in CY 2010.
(2) Because of the proprietary nature of this company’s customer count information, only the complaint figures for CY 2009 and CY 2010 have been provided.
(3) The customer counts for these aggregators are included in the customer count figures provided
by the associated suppliers

 

[ad#uconn468]

Similar Posts:

Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *





c-hit logo