New London Day Claims Blumenthal Vietnam Whistleblower Had Problems As An Assistant Atty Gen

The following story appeared in today’s edition of the New London Day:

New London Day: Blumenthal Critic Had His Share Of Problems In State’s AG Office

By Ted Mann

The assistant attorney general who this week accused his boss, Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, of lying to him about having served in Vietnam has clashed in the past with superiors in the attorney general’s office.

Marine Major Richard Hine (photo Chris Richie)

Richard R. Hine, 60, of New Britain, said in a letter reported in multiple Connecticut news outlets that Blumenthal had claimed to have served in Vietnam during a conversation about Hine’s concerns that he – then a member of the Marine Corps Reserve – might be called up to fight in Operation Desert Storm in the early 1990s.

Hine was “appalled and shocked, because I knew he had not been to Vietnam,” he said in the letter, which has been republished on a number of political blogs from around the state.

Personnel records from the Office of the Attorney General show that Hine has been suspended without pay twice, in 1993 and 1995, during his tenure with the office.

The first disciplinary action is outlined in a 1993 memo that charges Hine had not “competently, diligently and promptly handled the representation of the state in the cases assigned to you,” citing three cases in which Hine allegedly “failed to properly investigate the facts and formulate and pursue an adequate defense of the state’s interests or those of the individual state employees you were assigned to represent.”

The Day first learned of Hine’s prior disciplinary record through a source unconnected to any Connecticut political campaign. The documents were provided Wednesday by the Office of the Attorney General after The Day filed a Freedom of Information Act request.

Hine did not respond Wednesday to multiple phone messages.

Less than one month after the Feb. 5, 1993, memo from Deputy Attorney General Aaron S. Bayer, which informed Hine he could be subject to discipline “up to and including dismissal,” a second memo from Bayer outlines Hine’s punishment: two weeks of suspension without pay, and a transfer – at Hine’s then-current salary – to work in the attorney general’s Workers Compensation Department.

Less than two years later, Hine was again notified of impending disciplinary action over charges that he had repeatedly been absent from the office, including out of state, during work hours; used his state phone to make personal calls to his ex-wife, a friend and his veterinarian; and violated a ban on using his office for personal gain by presenting his attorney general business card to a state trooper after a traffic accident and stating “words to the effect that ‘this should be all you need.’ ”

The 1995 memo also said Hine was accused of “settling cases without authorization and inappropriate behavior at work.” Hine also drove from August to September 1994 while his driver license was suspended, the memo said.

In a stipulated agreement dated July 6, 1995, Hine did not admit guilt but agreed to three more weeks of unpaid leave, reimbursement of more than $1,400 for unauthorized phone calls and mileage payments, and several other provisions that were redacted in the personnel documents provided to The Day.

Even before the documents were obtained, rumors swirled about Hine’s relationship to his boss. That led Blumenthal’s Senate opponent, Republican Linda McMahon, to criticize the attorney general for what her campaign portrayed as an attempt to smear a prominent critic who has revived a story line that damaged Blumenthal’s standing with some voters.

A McMahon spokesman, Ed Patru, charged that Blumenthal was effectively doing to Hine what he and his staff have condemned for years: punishing a whistleblower.

“Isn’t it ironic that Dick Blumenthal is always so eager to protect the voice of the whistleblower, but his campaign apparatus this week is working round the clock to discredit whistleblower Richard Hine by calling him a ‘disgruntled employee,’ ” Patru said in an e-mail sent to news organizations Wednesday afternoon.

Blumenthal’s campaign, however, insists it has said nothing to discredit Hine.

“No, the campaign has not released any information about Mr. Hine or his work,” Blumenthal campaign spokeswoman Maura Downes said.

In a statement, Blumenthal campaign manager Mindy Myers did not address Patru’s criticism head-on, but said McMahon “needs to stop her negative campaigning.”

“As news reports have pointed out, this story originated from a Republican who actively supports Linda McMahon,” Myers said.

The quote in Patru’s e-mail comes from a video clip he linked to, in which NBC Connecticut’s chief political correspondent, Tom Monahan, paraphrased Hine’s concern that his reputation was being attacked by those sympathetic to Blumenthal.

Share

7 Comments on "New London Day Claims Blumenthal Vietnam Whistleblower Had Problems As An Assistant Atty Gen"

  1. George Gombossy | June 10, 2010 at 10:27 am |

    My hat off to the Day on this story and my rear is black and blue for kicking myself for failing to ask Major Hine whether he had any personnel issues at the AG office.

    That said I have some observations:

    The tip had to come from within the AG office
    If not let’s hear Blumenthal deny it, which he has not
    Will Blumenthal investigate who leaked this information to damage a whistle blower?
    The release of the documents appears to violate long standing policy at the AG office that requires a minimum of one week of research prior to acting on any FOI request involving sensitive issues. I know because that is the policy that has been followed on all my requests
    And finally there is no accusation that Assistant Atty Hine is a liar or incompetent as a trial Atty. If he were Blumenthal should have fired him.
    As all good lawyers know, a sharp sword cuts both ways.
    George

    • As I noted in the story yesterday about the AG’s office, you are less than objective when reporting on this topic. Perhaps that’s why you were so quick to get this disgruntled employees story out without doing a thorough investigation. The guy waits 20 years to launch this bomb of a story, and it never crosses your mind to ask him if it’s got any issues with his employer? See my comment on Advocate type of journalism. Talk about irony.

      Let’s go after the crooked businesses that defraud people, and the numerous ways consumers are getting ripped off in this state. That’s what you do best.

      • of the 10 stories you have up in your “more stories” section, 4 are critical of the AG. Bias much?

  2. Joe Alves | June 10, 2010 at 2:03 pm |

    We all saw this coming.Who among us hasn’t clashed with a former employer? Are we supposed to bewliev that this professional kept it bottled up for 15 years until the time was right? Give me a break. This guy is a professional and a Marine. He got sick of the lies.That’s what I think. He’s got guts.

  3. ellee rose | June 10, 2010 at 6:17 pm |

    Today you asked why newspapers were not focusing more on Vietnamgate. Perhaps this is part of the answer. When dealing with legality, it often ends up in a he-said, she-said modality. And of course, there is always a disgruntled worker. [The same as living amidst disgruntled residents]. But Hine still is the Asst. Attorney General, right? At this… See More moment, I take heart that there are elements of Mr. Hine’s perfect career which are less than perfect. I do wish we could move past this and just get on with a platforml. Every day, we implode the Democratic ticket, Linda McMahon wins by default. Regardless of the Vietnam issue, Blumenthal was chosen the DEM choice for Governor. Now I have to believe one of four things came out of this convention platform. 1] we have impossible do or die loyalists who believe in Never Never Land, 2] the Dems will regroup, recoup and forge ahead with Mr. Blumenthal, 3] a surprise candidate will come out of the political closet and run independently or, the most popular at the moment…..4] the CT Democratic Convention ORDAINED Linda McMahon as presumptive Governor of the State of CT.

  4. ellee rose | June 10, 2010 at 6:20 pm |

    oops so sorry, I meant SENATOR. ooops, so sorry.

  5. The Day needs to say more about this anonymous source other than that it had nothing to do with the campaign. Was it an employee of the AG’s office?

    Hine had to know this would come out, so I feel like what he said Blumenthal said to him must have really bothered him enough to take that risk.

    Anyway, Hine is not the first marine whose worked for Blumenthal to have a problem with him.

    Years ago, another resigned in protest or was fired when Blumenthal took him off an investigation of public corruption he felt was bearing fruit.

    They disagreed. The lawyer thought Blumenthal should put up a paper wall because of conflicts of interest, like US Att Kevin O’Connor did on the Rowland investigation, staying out of it, letting his lawyers investigate it. Blumenthal refused according to him.

    Blumenthal shut down the investigation, which I think was begun before he took office, and pushed the lawyer out. It was in the newspapers at the time. I think I am relaying it more or less as it was reported then. You can dig it up. I think the Wash Post mentioned it then, years ago, 80s, something like that, right after Blumenthal became CT US attorney for a while. Blumenthal was US Attorney in Connecticut for a while, before he was AG

Comments are closed.